Panteleev Sergey, диакон

Peter of Syunik (Petros Syunetsi) and a problem of reconstructing theology in the Armenian Church of the 6th century

Panteleev Sergey (2020) "Peter of Syunik (Petros Syunetsi) and a problem of reconstructing theology in the Armenian Church of the 6th century ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia III : Filologiia, 2020, vol. 65, pp. 58-69 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturIII202065.58-69


If one disregards the earliest times, the development of an independent philosophical and theological tradition in the Armenian Church was parallel to the development in that Church of a negative attitude towards the doctrine of Christology as formulated by the Council of Chalcedon. The refutation of Chalcedonian heritage necessitated an alternative doctrine, which found its expression in works of Severus of Antioch (if one goes beyond the boundaries of the Armenian Church). But this “father of Monophysite Christology” was anathematised for a long period by the Armenian Church at an offi cial level. How then did the Armenian theology develop under these circumstances, and who were its principal creators? Peter, the Bishop of Syunik (late 5th — fi rst half of the 6th cc.), may well be acknowledged as one of them. His works extend to many fi elds of theology, but his main interest was in Christology. This is evidenced by his lost work Against the Chalcedonites, a Christmas sermon, the extant Laudation of Theotokos, and fragments of Christological texts. In a work entitled “On Faith”, he lays out a history of church councils, but also considers in some detail the active phase of Christological disputes in the second quarter of the 5th century. Besides, the answers to questions on the Incarnation posed by Vachagan, the ruler of Caucasian Albania, have survived under the name of Peter of Syunik. Regardless of who this text was written by, it is an important testimony to the conceptualisation in the Armenian Church of the mystery of the unity of the divine and the human in the Christ. A comprehensive study of the literary heritage of Bishop Peter is beyond the scope of this article. Its aim is to invite attention to this nearly forgotten theologian of the Armenian Church and provide a brief description of his works. The study of his heritage needs to be continued because otherwise it is impossible to properly reconstruct the Armenian theology in the first centuries after the Council of Chalcedon.


veneration of Theotokos, Council of Dvin, Peter of Syunik (Petros Syunetsi), martyr Yazidbouzid (Astvatsatur), Severus of Antioch, Armenian literature, Armenian classical authors, Christology, homilies


  1. Abegian M. (1948) Istoriia drevnearmianskoi literatury [History of the Classical Armenian literature]. Yerevan (in Russian).
  2. Arevshatian S. (2016) Formirovanie filosofskoi nauki v Drevnei Armenii (V–VI vv.) [Formation of the philosophical science in Ancient Armenia (5th — 6th cc.)]. Yerevan (in Russian).
  3. Hovhan Imastasēr Ojnecʽi (1994) “Saks žoġovocʽ, vor eġen i haykʽ” [About the synods of the Armenians], in Girkʽ tʽġtʽocʽ [The book of letters]. Jerusalem. P. 473–493 (in Armenian).
  4. Lebon J. (1951) “La christologie du monophysisme syrien“, in A. Grillmeier, H. Bacht (eds) Das Konzil von Chalkedon: Geschichte und Gegenwart. Bd. 1: Der Glaube von Chalkedon. Würzburg. P. 425–580.
  5. Nerses Ṙažik (2004) “Vkayabanutʽun srboyn Yiztibuztean” [The martyrdom of St. Yazidbouzid], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ [Armenian classical authors], vol. 3 Antelias. P. 461–465.
  6. Panteleev S. (2019) “Gladzorskii monastyr’ — srednevekovyi universitet Armenii” [Gladzor Monastery: a mediaeval Armenian university”]. Tserkovnyi istorik, 1, 1, p. 57–67 (in Russian).
  7. Panteleev S. (2011) “Nekotorye aspekty vospriiatij a Khalkidonskogo Sobora Armianskoi tserkov’iu soglasno “Knige poslanii”” [Some aspects of perceiving the Council of Chalcedon in the Armenian Church according to the Book of Letters], in Sovremennye problemy izucheniia istorii Tserkvi: Mezhdunarodnaia nauchnaia konferentsiia [Ecclesiastical history today: an international conference]. Moscow. P. 260–270 (in Russian).
  8. Petros Siunecʽi (2004) “Govest i Surb Astvacacin” [Laudation of Theotokos], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ [Armenian classical authors], vol. 3. Antelias. P. 389–395 (in Armenian).
  9. Petros Siunecʽi (2004) “Tʽuġtʽ aṙ Yiztibuzit” [Epistle to Yazidbouzid], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 410 (in Armenian).
  10. Petros Siunecʽi (2004) “Yaġags havatoy” [On faith], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 406–407 (in Armenian).
  11. Petros Siunecʽi (2004) “Yaġags marmavorutʽean” [On the Incarnation], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 409 (in Armenian).
  12. Petros Siunecʽi (2004) “Yaġags marmavorutʽean Teaṙ” [On the Incarnation of the Lord], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 396–405 (in Armenian).
  13. Poġorean N. (1966) “Petrosi Siuneacʽ yepiskoposi aṙ Surbn Hiztibuzti yoržam i handri ēr i Dvin” [The letter of Bishop Peter of Syunik to St. Yazidbouzid when the latter was in Dvin]. Ēǰmiajin [Echmiadzin], 1, p. 50 (in Armenian).
  14. Kʽēosēean Y. (2004) “Petros Siunecʽi ev ir erkerə” [Peter of Syunik and his works”], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 387–388 (in Armenian).
  15. Kʽēosēean Y. (2004) “Vkayabanutʽyun srboyn Yiztibuztean” [The martyrdom of St. Yazidbouzid], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ, vol. 3, p. 459–460 (in Armenian).
  16. Yakobean P. (ed.) (1998) Tēr-Mkrtčʽean G. Hayagitakan usumnasirutʽivnner [Armenian studies], book 2. Etchmiadzin (in Armenian).
  17. Yovhannēs Gabeġenacʽi (2004) “Tʽuġtʽ aṙ Vrtʽanis Siunecʽi yepiskopos yev aṙ tēr Mihr Artašir” [Epistle to the bishop of Syunik Vrtanes and to Lord Mihr Artashir], in Matenagirkʽ Hayocʽ [Armenian classical authors], vol. 3. Antelias. P. 445–447 (in Armenian).

Information about the author

Panteleev Sergey, диакон

Academic Degree: Candidate of Sciences* in Theology;
Academic Rank: Associate Professor;
Place of work: Moscow Theological Academy; Sergiev Posad, 141300, Russian Federation;
ORCID: 0000-0003-0376-1270;
Email: pantspinum@yandex.ru.

*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.