/

Davydenkov Oleg, archpriest

The Concept of An Individual Nature In the Christology of Leontius of Byzantium


Davydenkov Oleg (2013) "The Concept of An Individual Nature In the Christology of Leontius of Byzantium ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia, 2013, vol. 47, pp. 7-17 (in Russian).

Abstract

The author examines the idea of an individual nature as conceived by Leontius of Byzantium, a defender of the Council of Chalcedon, who used it to counter the arguments of the Monophysites, who themselves developed the notion of a partial nature (substance). The author further attempts to define the influence which Leontius exerted over the formulation of a new concept of hypostasis as conceived by the Diophysites. In order to study this point in detail, the author examines the later work of Leontius, especially his Epilisis. By means of a thorough analysis of this work, he reveals the intention of Leontius to perfect the terminology of the Diophysites by stating the fundamental problem in philosophical terms. In this work, Leontius demonstrates that the idea of a self-sufficient hypostasis in the humanity of Christ is absent and shows that the idea of a hypostasis of this type is found only in Christ as the Logos. The author concludes that the human nature of Christ may be considered as a type of general nature and as a result it may be seen to relate to all other hypostases of human nature as the general to the particular in so much as there exists a real hypostatic unity with the Logos

Keywords

Christological disputes, Diphysites, Monophysites, nature, hypostasis, individual nature, partial substance, common nature

References

1. Cross R. 2002. Individual Natures in the Christology of Leontius of Byzantium. Journal of Early Christian Studies, vol. 10.2, pp. 245–265.
2. Gorskij A. K., Setnickij N. A. 1995. Sochinenija (The Writings). Мoscow, 1995, pp. 19–96.
3. Grillmeier A. Le Christ dans la tradition chretienne. Рaris, 1993. Vol. 2.2.
4. Daley B. 1976. The Origenism of Leontius of Byzantium. Journal of Theological Studies, vol. 27, pp. 333–369.
5. Davydenkov O. V. Hristologicheskaja sistema Sevira Antiohijskogo: Dogmaticheskij analiz (Severus of Antioch’s christological system: dogmatic study). Мoscow, 2007.
6. Davydenkov O. V. 2008. «Voipostasnaja sushhnost'» v bogoslovii Ioanna Grammatika (Ἐνυπόστατος οὐσία in the Theology of John the Grammarian). Bulletin of St Tikhon’s University I, vol. 2 (22), pp. 7–13.
7. Davydenkov O. V. 2009. Koncepcii «slozhnaja ipostas'» i «slozhnaja priroda» v kontekste hristianskih sporov VI v. (Concepts of «complex hypostasis» and «complex nature» in Context of Christological Debates of the VI cen.). Bulletin of St Tikhon’s University I, vol. 1 (25), pp. 7–24.
8. Davydenkov O. V. 2012. Problema sootnoshenija obshhego i edinichnogo v hristologii umerennogo monofizitstva VI veka: Ioann Filopon (k voprosu o filosofskoj problematike hristologicheskih diskussij jepohi Vselenskih soborov) (The Correlation Problem of Common and Single in the Christology of the VI c. Temperate Monophysitismus: John Philopon). Vestnik OGU, vol. 2 (22), pp. 212–216.
9. Δελημβάση Α. Δ. Ἡ αἵρησις τοῦ μονοφυσιτισμοῦ χθες καὶ σῆμερον (The Heresy of the Monophysitism today and yesterday). Athens, 1994.
10. Dell’Osso K. Il calcedonismo Leonzio di Bisanzio. Rome, 2003.
11. Evans D. B. Leontius of Byzantium. An origenist Christology. Washington, 1970.
12. Florovskij G. V. Vostochnye otcy V–VIII vekov (Oriental fathers of V–VIII centuries). Мoscow, 1992.
13. Frend W. H. C. The Rise of the Monophysite Movement. Cambridge, 1979.
14. Hainthaler Th. 1990. Grillmeier A. Jesus der Christus im Glauben der Kirche. Freiburg im Breisgau, 1990, vol. 2.4, pp. 109–149.
15. Lang U. M. John Philoponus and the Controversies over Chalcedon in the sixth Century (a Study and Translation of the Arbiter). Leuven, 2001.
16. Lynch J. J. 1975. Leontius of Byzantium. A Cyrillian Christology. Theological Studies, vol. 36.3, pp. 455–471.
17. Lur’e V. M. Vizantijskaja filosofija. Formativnyj period (Byzantine Philosophy. Formative Preiod). Saint-Peyersburg, 2006.
18. Mejendorf I. Iisus Hristos v vostochnom pravoslavnom bogoslovii (Christ in the Eastern Christian Thought). Мoscow, 2000.
19. Murphy F.-X., Sherwood P. Constantinople II et III. Paris, 1974.
20. Petrov V. V. Maksim Ispovednik: ontologija i metod v vizantijskoj filosofii VII veka (Maximus the Confessor: ontology and method in the 7th century byzantine philosophy). Мoscow, 2007.
21. Richard M. 1947. Leontius de Byzance etail-il origeniste? Revue des Etudes Byzantines, vol. 5, pp. 31–66.
22. Shhukin T. A. 2009. Antologij a vostochno-hristianskoj bogoslovskoj mysli (Anthology of the orient Christian theological Thought). Saint-Petersburg, 2009, vol. 1, pp. 645–657.
23. Sokolov V. 2005. Pravoslavie i monofizitstvo (Orthodoxy and Monophysitism). Perm, 2005. pp. 76–113.
24. Sokolov V. Zavershenie Vizantijskoj hristologii posle Leontij a Vizantijskogo (Completion of the byzantine history after Leontius of Byzantium). Perm, 2005.
25. Sokolov V. 2006. Leontij Vizantijskij : sbornik issledovanij (Leontius of Byzantium: collected studies). Мoscow, 2006, pp. 10–458.

Information about the author

Davydenkov Oleg, archpriest

PDF