The naming of God: apophatic and antinomic approaches
Goryachev Danil (2023)
"The naming of God: apophatic and antinomic approaches ",
Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie
pp. 9-24 (in Russian).
DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI2023106.9-24
The article explores the issues of the naming of God: is it possible to name God, how the name and the Named are connected, does God have his own name, is the formula "the name of God is God" acceptable for the Christian worldview? The answers to these questions are given in the article using two methods: apophatic and antinomic. The objectives of the study are: firstly, to clarify the church's view of the phenomenon of the name of God, and secondly, to compare the two ways of this clarification, designated as apophatic and antinomic. The basis for understanding apophatic theology in the work is the writings of the Corpus Areopagiticum, where apophatic can be considered as a condition of spiritual vision and mystical theology, as well an intellectual cognitive path. The result of the apophatic approach in the article is called the principle of the unconfusedly and indivisible unity of the name and the Named. This principle, applied by Russian religious philosophers to express the connection of God and His name, is found in the priest Pavel Florensky, but his philosophy is associated by researchers primarily with the antinomic method. The unconfusedly and indivisible of the name and the Named in the antinomic reading acquires the paradoxical character of two mutually exclusive statements about the Divinity and non-divinity of the name of God. Also antinomy are statements taken at the same time and in the same relation, about the presence and absence of God's own name. The study concludes with the formulation of conclusions, among which the theological acceptability of the statement that «the name of God is God» is noted.
antinomy, apophasa, imyaslavie, philosophy of the name, unconfusedly and indivisibly union, Divine essence and energies,
- Alfeiev I. (2021) Sviashchennaia taina tserkvi. Vvedenie v istoriiu i problematiku imiaslavskikh sporov [The sacred mystery of the Church. Introduction to the history and problems of the Onomatodoxic disputes]. Moscow (in Russian).
- Andronik (Trubachev) (2016) Put k Bogu. Lichnost, zhizn i tvorchestvo sviashchennika Pavla Florenskogo [The Way to God. The personality, life and work of the Priest Pavel Florensky]. Book 4. Sergiev Posad (in Russian).
- Bulgakov S. (1953) Filosofiia Imeni [The philosophy of the name]. Paris (in Russian).
- Feuerbach L. (1995) Das Wesen des Christentums. Moscow (Russian translation).
- Filaret (Drozdov) (2010) Izbrannye mesta iz sviashchennoi istorii Vetkhogo i Novogo zaveta s nazidatelJnymi razmyshleniiami [Selected passages from the sacred history of the Old and New Testaments with educational refl ections]. Samara (in Russian).
- Florensky P. (2017) Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [The Pillar and ground of the truth]. Moscow (in Russian).
- Florensky P. (2017) U vodorazdelov mysli [At the watersheds of thought]. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russian).
- Frank S. (2000) “Nepostizhimoe” [The unknowable], in Sochineniia [Works], Moscow, pp. 247‒798 (in Russian).
- Losev A. (1993) Ocherki antichnogo simvolizma i mifologii [Essays in ancient symbolism and mythology]. Moscow (in Russian).
- Losev A. (2009) Izbrannye trudy po imiaslaviiu i korpusu sochinenii Dionisiia Areopagita [Selected works on the Onomatodoxia and corpus of the works of Dionysius the Areopagite]. St. Petersburg (in Russian).
- Lossky V. (2003) Bogovidenie [Vision of God]. Moscow (in Russian).
- Prokhorov G. (ed.) (2017) Corpus Areopagiticum. St. Petersburg (Russian translation).
- Sidorov A. (ed.) (1994) Evagrius Ponticus. Opera. Moscow (Russian translation).
- Sophroniy (Sakharov) (2008) Perepiska s protoiereem Georgiem Florovskim [Correspondence with Archpriest Georgy Florovsky]. Sergiev Posad (in Russian).
- Tyulenev V. (ed.) (2020) Augustinus Hipponensis. In Evangelium Ioannis. Vol. 2. Moscow (Russian translation).
Information about the author
Goryachev Danil, priest Academic Degree:
Candidate of Sciences*
in Theology; Student status:
Graduate student; Place of study:
Belgorod Orthodox Theological Seminary; Post:
lecturer; ORCID: 0000-0002-1632-9738
*According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011, the degree of Candidate of Sciences (Cand.Sc.) belongs to ISCED level 8 — "doctoral or equivalent", together with PhD, DPhil, D.Lit, D.Sc, LL.D, Doctorate or similar.