/

Grishina Elena

Leo Tolstoy in the Dialectic of B. P. Vysheslavtsev


Grishina Elena (2022) "Leo Tolstoy in the Dialectic of B. P. Vysheslavtsev ", Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia I : Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. Religiovedenie, 2022, vol. 102, pp. 53-69 (in Russian).

DOI of the paper: 10.15382/sturI2022102.53-69

Abstract

The author tries to reconstruct the philosophical dialogue between B. P. Vysheslavtsev and L. N. Tolstoy. Since the beliefs of these thinkers on philosophical, legal, religious and socio-economic issues are at first glance opposite, the article examines both their differences and their similarities. The author examines the texts in which Tolstoy is mentioned, analyzes the context and identifies a number of ideas that could help in studying the worldview of both philosophers and the problems they raise. At first glance, Vysheslavtsev's Tolstoy themes are collected in the field of philosophy of law, but a deeper discussion allows us to see that these themes have religious motives. The significance of the figure of P. I. Novgorodtsev in the formation of Vysheslavtsev as a dialectic. The philosopher draws a monumental image of Tolstoy, at the same time noting the naivety of his decisions and trying to comprehend the objective reasons for his rebellion. In this regard, the reasons for the uprising of Vysheslavtsev himself, who actively opposed all kinds of totalitarianism and violent social actions, become more understandable and justified. In his opinion, power can only be justified by a transition to a completely different existential state, that is, into a state of relative anarchy. Such a state of socio-political structures is "law" and "democracy" (a phenomenon opposite to "dictatorship"). Vysheslavtsev reflects on the antinomy of the absolute and the relative and comes to the conclusion, that the absolute can only be realized in relative forms in the relative. However, the absolute is not only an idea that drives a person on the path of self-improvement and social development, but also the Highest element of human nature, on the basis of which, according to the Christian promise, the divine dispensation of life is formed. The realization of the idea of personal morality requires a properly organized state. Such a state, in his opinion, is quite possible. However, analyzing the complexity of Moderna, summing up the results of the last period of the development of industrial culture (the 50s of the XX century), the philosopher declares a very disappointing result, which, however, does not deprive him of optimism about the ways to find new constructive solutions.

Keywords

Vysheslavtsev, Tolstoy, Novgorodtsev, antinomy, law, power, Christian anarchism

References

  1. Evlampiev I. (2018) “‘Anarkhizm’ L. N. Tolstogo i ego vozmozhnye fi losofskie osnovaniia” [“Anarchism” of L. N. Tolstoy and its possible philosophical foundations], in Russkaia literatura i filosofiia: puti vzaimodeistviia [Russian literature and philosophy: ways of interaction], Moscow, pp. 180–195 (in Russian).
  2. Solntseva N. (2017) “Vysheslavtsev Boris Petrovich”, in A. Kling, A. Kholikov (eds) Russkie lite raturovedy XX veka: biobibliografi cheskii slovar′ [Russian literary critics of the 20th century: biobibliographical dictionary], vol. 1: A–L, Moscow; St. Petersburg, pp. 212–213 (in Russian).
  3. Tabakov A. (2017) “‘Spravedlivost′’ i pravo: nekotorye aspekty sootnosheniia v russkoi fi losofi i prava vtoroi poloviny XIX — pervoi poloviny XX veka” [“Justice” and law: some aspects of the correlation in the Russian philosophy of law of the second half of the 19th — fi rst half of the 20th centuries]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 11: Pravo, no. 3, pp. 88–97 (in Russian).
  4. Vysheslavtsev B. (1929) Khristianstvo i sotsial′nyi vopros [Christianity and the social issue]. Paris; Warsaw (in Russian).
  5. Vysheslavtsev B. (1923) Russkaia stikhiia u Dostoevskogo [The Russian element in Dostoevsky]. Berlin (in Russian).
  6. Vysheslavtsev B. (1924) “Religiia i bezreligioznost′” [Religion and irreligiousness], in Problemy russkogo religioznogo soznaniia. Sbornik statei [Issues in Russian religious consciousness. Collection of articles], Berlin, pp. 7–52 (in Russian).
  7. Vysheslavtsev B. (1926) “Dva puti sotsial′nogo dvizheniia” [Two ways of social movement]. Put′, no. 4, pp. 127–138 (in Russian).
  8. Vysheslavtsev B. (1928) “Lev Tolstoy”, in A. Cherny, V. Zenkovsky (eds) Russkaia zemlia: al′manakh dlia iunoshestva [Land of Russia: an almanac for young people], Paris, pp. 91–95 (in Russian).
  9. Vysheslavtsev B. (1934) “Problema vlasti i ee religioznyi smysl” [The problem of power and its religious meaning]. Put′, no. 42, pp. 3–21 (in Russian).
  10. Vysheslavtsev B. (1938) “Obraz Bozhii v grekhopadenii” [The image of God in the fall of man]. Put′, no. 55, pp. 24–40 (in Russian).
  11. Vysheslavtsev B. (1940) “Bogoostavlennost′” [Godforsakenness]. Put′, no. 61, pp. 15–21 (in Russian).
  12. Vysheslavtsev B. (1994) Etika preobrazhennogo Erosa [Ethics of the transformed Eros]. Moscow (in Russian).
  13. Vysheslavtsev B. (1994) Vechnoe v russkoi filosofii [The eternal in Russian philosophy]. Moscow (in Russian).
  14. Vysheslavtsev B. (1995) “Krizis industrial′noi kul′tury” [Crisis of industrial culture], in V. Sapov (ed.) Sochineniia [Works], Moscow, pp. 181–434 (in Russian).
  15. Vysheslavtsev B. (1995) “Russkii natsional′nyi kharakter” [Russian national character]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 6, pp. 111–122 (in Russian).

Information about the author

Grishina Elena


Student status: Graduate student;
Place of study: St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities; Moscow, Russia;
ORCID: 0000-0002-9214-1024;
Email: abameleck@yandex.ru.